Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > Quoting Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@tigerstaden.no>: > >> Notice which section of the HTML specification 'target' is described >> in. That's right -- the Frames section. XHTML 1.1 doesn't have >> Frames. Neither will XHTML 2.0. @target is deprecated and doesn't >> exist in neither HTML 4.01 Strict nor XHTML 1.0 Strict. Its use is >> prescribed and is behavioural. > > > That was a mistake. We need "target" at least for <object>. Why? If it's for the same reason that target currently exists and you're planning on using <object> like an iframe, then no, that's wrong. Links are for moving from one resource to another. <object> is for external data that is part of the current resource. If you're changing the source of the <object> data, then you're changing the current resource, and it belongs in the realm of javascript. ("Resource" here meaning the same thing it does in URL/URI) -- dolphinling <http://dolphinling.net/>Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2006 17:06:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:05 GMT