- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:19:47 +0200 (CEST)
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
On 23 Jun, David Woolley wrote:
>> the CSS class name.
>
> class is not a CSS class name. That's a common misunderstanding and
> leads to class=red, as it becomes viewed as presentational.
And one I strive to avoid making. Mea culpa.
> It should still be a sub-classing of the semantics. One is in a
> halfway house, where the sub-classing is not universal, but in a
I disagree. Semantic interpretation should be associated with
elements, not attribute values- IMHO, but I would hope that isn't
needed.
--
- Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies (UK) Ltd.
tina@greytower.co.uk http://www.greytower.co.uk
+46 708 557 905
Received on Monday, 26 June 2006 14:18:45 UTC