Sebastian Redl wrote: > Not true. To me, this suggests that the whole construct is only valid in > character sets that have the ASCII set as a direct subset, such as UTF-8 > and ISO-8859-*, but only after the meta may characters outside the ASCII > range appear. I don't see how you can obtain those semantics from the prose : >> The META declaration must be used only when the character encoding >> is organized such that ASCII-valued bytes stand for ASCII characters >> (at least until the META element is parsed). This talks specifically about "ASCII-valued bytes", and says nothing at all about non-ASCII-valued bytes. Philip TaylorReceived on Saturday, 3 June 2006 14:50:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 07:54:33 GMT