Philip TAYLOR schreef: > it interprets the META directive as you would wish. But in so > doing, it starts to parse the document on the basis of it being > expressed in ISO-9999-9, whereupon it discovers that there wasn't > a META directive at all, there was, rather, a(n ill-formed) BODY > tag. But because it now knows there /was/ no META directive, it > parses using ISO-8859-1. But that means there IS a META > directive. And so on. I'm sure you see the problem ... On the other hand you see that languages such as CSS use a similar mechanism to determine the character encoding: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#x62 So it’s not without precedent. Of course due to the constraints that CSS puts on the location and the encoding of the character encoding identifier, it’s a lot simpler to determine than in HTML. ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 07:54:33 GMT