W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > July 2006

Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript

From: magick <jasper.magick@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:44:45 -0400
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-id: <44CE256D.3000304@gmail.com>

>
> > > <a href="sword.gif" onclick="annoyingPopup();"><img 
> > > src="thumb_sword.gif" alt="..."/></a>
>
> > No that won't work because it will open the image in a pop-up *and* in 
> > the window.  So it just opens the image twice.
>
> The only problem was that he forgot to include "return false" in the
> onclick.

Thank you, that did work as expected :)

> In all fairness Jasper, ....... <http://www.mikeash.com/getting_answers.html>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Stevne Pemberton

Understood.  When the topic started going off into all different 
directions, I got confused as I was reading all this information that 
didn't have to do with the issue but rather changed the issue around.  
Like when I asked if <noscript> was being renamed, then I read all these 
replies about how it's not needed and/or not supported in xhtml2 and I 
was like "what?  if it's not even supported why didn't the original 
reply state that in it".

Again, I'm sorry for any aggression I displayed in this mailing list.  
Steven, you seem to give more clear information than others in these 
lists and I thank you for that.  With everyone else the information is 
fuzzy and left to interpretation.
Received on Monday, 31 July 2006 15:45:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:07 GMT