- From: magick <jasper.magick@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:05:07 -0400
- To: www-html@w3.org
Well that's what I was told once by Matt of IPS (an international company that makes web applications) > On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 12:51:02PM -0400, magick wrote: > > It adds a new query string to the url (site.com/page.html#top) > > That isn't a query string, it is a fragment identifier. > > > The JS method puts less strain on the server since it doesn't have to > > send a new query to the server to find out where on the page to jump to. > > Linking to a fragment of an existing document does not, in any browser > that I know of, trigger a new request to the server. All the > information the browser needs to find the fragment is in the document > it already has in memory. > > -- > David Dorward
Received on Saturday, 29 July 2006 17:05:32 UTC