W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > July 2006

Re: xhtml 2.0 noscript

From: magick <jasper.magick@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:05:07 -0400
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-id: <44CB9543.6000203@gmail.com>

Well that's what I was told once by Matt of IPS (an international 
company that makes web applications)

> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 12:51:02PM -0400, magick wrote:
> > It adds a new query string to the url (site.com/page.html#top)
> That isn't a query string, it is a fragment identifier.
> > The JS method puts less strain on the server since it doesn't have to 
> > send a new query to the server to find out where on the page to jump to.
> Linking to a fragment of an existing document does not, in any browser
> that I know of, trigger a new request to the server. All the
> information the browser needs to find the fragment is in the document
> it already has in memory.
> -- 
> David Dorward
Received on Saturday, 29 July 2006 17:05:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:07 GMT