Re: [XHTML 2.0] emphesis

David Woolley wrote:
>> use. For instance if many new elements are added that
>> describe human emotions then they can all be moved to
>> a new "emotion" module. At least this is the
>> impression I got from XHTML Modularization.u
>>     
>
> That sounds to me like an attempt to replace XML with
> XHTML.  The current policy is, I believe, that XHTML
> provides a small set of easy to learn features that allow
> relatively unskilled people to write useful documents, but,
> by using XML namespaces, it can be extended in domain 
> specific ways.
>   
That's correct.  You can create whatever modules you want in your 
domain, and connect them to your markup language using Modularization 
techniques.

Of course, you then need to persuade a user agent to do something with 
them. 

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com