W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > January 2006

Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated

From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 01:05:00 +0100
Message-ID: <43CD862C.9080307@students.cs.uu.nl>
To: Spartanicus <spartanicus.3@ntlworld.ie>
Cc: W3C HTML List <www-html@w3.org>

Spartanicus schreef:
>>> only tool that should have access to the content snippets, it's
>>> configuration should ensure how the snippet is handled (i.e. included
>>> verbatim without parsing it or doing anything else to it).
>>>       
>> An application transcluding fragments might well treat plain text as 
>> CDATA, or as completely devoid of XML codes, whereas when transcluding 
>> XHTML fragments would parse the content.
>>     
>
> Sorry, "transclude" or "transcluding" is not in my dictionaries.
>   

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transclusion


~Grauw

-- 
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2006 00:05:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:05 GMT