W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > January 2006

Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:04:42 +0000
Message-ID: <43CD4DDA.3080208@splintered.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

Garret Wilson wrote:
>  The former is a fragment of a web page on XHTML
> explaining how to use the <em> element, and actually displays the 
> literal string "<em>foo</em>".

Should the < and > not be encoded as &lt; and &gt; in that particular case?

-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:04:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:05 GMT