- From: katrina maramba <ka3na_423@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 20:56:09 -0800 (PST)
- To: david@us-lot.org, www-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20060209045609.43458.qmail@web60214.mail.yahoo.com>
Can anybody answer my question below.. Thank you! =)
katrina maramba <ka3na_423@yahoo.com> wrote:
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 21:08:32 -0800 (PST)
From: katrina maramba <ka3na_423@yahoo.com>
To: david@us-lot.org
CC: www-html@w3.org
Subject: RE: XHTML Print & DTDs
David Dorward <david@us-lot.org> wrote: Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:58:29 +0000
From: David Dorward <david@us-lot.org>
To: katrina maramba <ka3na_423@yahoo.com>
CC: www-html@w3.org
Subject: XHTML Print & DTDs
> 4. As I stated, it is stated in the XHTML-Print spec that the DTD that
> should be used is xhtml-print10.dtd. What happens when the user
> specifies a different DTD (Strict, Transitional, Frameset)?
Then it won't be an XHTML-Print document :)
But that wouldn't be a fatal error, would it? Printers should still process this kind of document?
I have gathered a number of (supposed-to-be) XHTML-Print data from Nokia and Samsung cellphones. The DTD specified in both cellphone-generated XHTML-Print files is xhtml1-strict.dtd. They were accepted and printed in HP printers.
Here is an example. I got this from Samsung and the MIME header stated that it is XHTML-Print but its DTD is strict. Please take a look.
Content-Type: application/vnd.pwg-multiplexed; type=application/vnd.pwg-xhtml-print+xml
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
CHK 1 795 MORE
Content-Type: application/vnd.pwg-xhtml-print+xml
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-Location: bpp_jpg.xhtml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>....
.....
Any help and comment would be appreciated.
Thank you!
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
---------------------------------
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 04:56:14 UTC