Re: Question about XHTML 2.0 and content type

On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 22:08 +0100, Christian Hujer wrote:

> I'm glad that Mozilla negotiates to accept application/xhtml+xml with higher 
> priority than text/html, and I would like to see a tradition of proper 
> content negotiation being established.

A fudge to get XHTML+MathML documents. They advise HTML 4.01 Strict
still (since their browsers support it better).

-- 
David Dorward                           <http://dorward.me.uk/>
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad, in some way or another."
                             -- The Greatest Show in the Galaxy

Received on Thursday, 2 February 2006 21:13:38 UTC