W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > December 2006

Re: how is this Strict valid?

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:14:07 +0000
Message-ID: <458BF63F.1020603@splintered.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

Tina Holmboe wrote:

>   "Note that in XHTML 1.0, the name attribute of these elements is
>    formally deprecated, and will be removed in a subsequent version
>    of XHTML." - quote the XHTML 1.0 spec.
>   I wouldn't call it "perfectly ok".

Then we'll agree to disagree here. If there's a valid reason for using 
it, even if it's deprecated but still present, I'd call that perfectly 
ok (as long as the developer is aware of it).

Patrick H. Lauke
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
Received on Friday, 22 December 2006 15:14:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:14 UTC