On Wednesday 2006-12-06 09:05 +0900, olivier Thereaux wrote: > Serving XHTML 1.0 content as text/html is perfectly legit per the > XHTML 1.0 specification, and the section 5.1 you quote. There is even > an section on how to ensure that content served that way can be > interpreted by legacy user-agents. It's not just legacy user-agents. It's *all* user-agents, per the request of the HTML working group in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2000Sep/0024 I'm not sure if this ever made it in to any specifications, other than the italicized wording added to Appendix C in the second edition of XHTML 1.0: # Note that this recommendation does not define how HTML conforming # user agents should process HTML documents. Nor does it define the # meaning of the Internet Media Type text/html. For these # definitions, see [HTML4] and [RFC2854] respectively. -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801/#guidelines -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ > Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla CorporationReceived on Wednesday, 6 December 2006 00:20:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 07:54:34 GMT