W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > December 2006

Re: XHTML 1.0, section C14

From: James Pickering <jp29@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:42:09 -0700
Message-ID: <000601c715a2$5167a260$0200a8c0@jp29>
To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, <www-qa@w3.org>
Cc: "HTML Mailing List" <www-html@w3.org>, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>

Hi Karl,

I did not expect more than a notice from the W3C that my input for inclusion 
on your Content Negotiation page (relating to Zeuss Web Server) per the 
solicitation contained therein, was suitable or not.


J. Pickering
Home Page/Directory Portal: http://jp29.org/
XHTML: a troubled Markup language: http://jp29.org/test.php

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
To: "James Pickering" <jp29@cox.net>; <www-qa@w3.org>
Cc: "HTML Mailing List" <www-html@w3.org>; "Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux" 
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: XHTML 1.0, section C14

Hi James,

Le 2 dťc. 2006 ŗ 07:53, James Pickering a ťcrit :
> I became disillusioned with the W3C some time ago when I responded  to 
> their request for input relating to other popular Web Servers  (than 
> Apache) as solicited on their Web page relating to Content  Negotiation: 
> http://www.w3.org/2003/01/xhtml-mimetype/content- negotiation
> My input related to Zeus 3.xx. I never received an acknowledgement  of my 
> efforts nor was my input incorporated in their Web page.

Where did you send your input?
on www-qa@w3.org and/or dom@w3.org?

I see from you

I see plenty of replies of dom, bjoern, henri, jim, brian and myself
on the thread.

The document invites to comment and that is cool you sent more
background for the community. The discussion is a community process,
so when everyone is participating, everyone become richer of ideas.
Were you expecting more?
Thanks for your contribution, I'm pretty sure people on the list have
appreciated them.

> J. Pickering
> Home Page/Directory Portal: http://jp29.org/
> XHTML: a troubled Markup language: http://jp29.org/test.php
>> On 21 Nov, Shane McCarron wrote:
>>> And please, let's not devolve into a discussion about content
>>> negotiation.  The method above works.  Does it suck?  Sure.  Are  there
>>> browsers that lie in their request headers?  I surely hope not,  but if
>>> there are.... they deserve what they get.

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 1 December 2006 23:42:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:14 UTC