W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > August 2006

Re: sub/sup (was Re: samp, kbd, var)

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:04:05 +0100
Message-ID: <20060823100405.pnyr2a225jwgwk0w@www.splintered.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

Quoting David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>:

> There are many different elements to reflect the various uses of
> italics, but they are amongst the most misunderstood and under or
> mis-used elemnts in HTML (cite, address, dfn, etc.)

Exactly, so I wonder if the same approach couldn't conceivably be  
taken for at least some of the cases where sub/sup currently have to  
be used.

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 23 August 2006 09:08:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:07 GMT