- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:34:07 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > In this case then, using extensibility and namespacing, things like > CompSci specific markup, as well as mathematical/chemical/etc > specialised languages should be used, rather than keeping those very > specific (in the case of samp,kbd,var) and those completely > inappropriate (imho) elements (sub/sup) completely out of the generic > language. Oops, that last part after (sub/sup) should obviously have read "in a purportedly generic language". Got lost halfway through writing that sentence...;) P -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 22 August 2006 18:34:12 UTC