At 11:00 AM -0400 8/10/06, Jim Jewett wrote: >The current draft offers both id and xml:id, but says not to use both ... > >Is there any way for an xml module to alias or import an element, so >that the unnamespaced version (or the version in its own namespace) is >seen as equivalent to a specified element from elsewhere? I think the answer is that you can. For expert advice on how; and perhaps when to do this and when not to do it, you might try to wake up the list at <public-schemata-users@w3.org>. For an idea of what they are about, you could browse http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemata-users/2005Oct/thread.html#3 .. first, if you wish. Al PS: basic how-to-join etc. is findable from http://www.w3.org/Mail/Request >id is the obvious justification, but xml:base and xml:lang are also >fairly common, and I think it might help to resolve some of the >problems with xlink and xinclude. > >-jJReceived on Thursday, 10 August 2006 19:50:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:41 GMT