W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > August 2006

Re: xhtml2

From: Mike Whitehurst <*@mike-whitehurst.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:17:41 +0100
Message-ID: <003f01c6bc87$c0439820$0300a8c0@MIKE>
To: <www-html@w3.org>
the address element used on the spec is <address href="mailto:webmaster@example.net">Webmaster</address> .. that example is mistaken?
"No, pre doesn't indicate that the text is code." .. and why is that important? what about the <code> tag?"There is no hr element in the XHTML 2.0 draft." .. ok, but the fact is that <hr> is supported by browsers, and therefore should be re-used, instead of introducing a new tag to do the same thing.Mike Whitehurst
www.mike-whitehurst.co.uk 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: David Dorward 
  To: www-html@w3.org 
  Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 2:16 PM
  Subject: Re: xhtml2



  On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 02:09:35PM +0100, Mike Whitehurst wrote:
  >    address = a ... pointless

  How do you use an anchor to markup:

   <address>
     <l>Tony Blair</l>
     <l>10 Downing Street</l>
     <l>London</l>
   </address>

  ?

  >    blockcode = pre ... pointless

  No, pre doesn't indicate that the text is code.

  >    separator = hr ... pointless

  There is no hr element in the XHTML 2.0 draft.

  -- 
  David Dorward                                      http://dorward.me.uk




  -- 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.7/409 - Release Date: 04/08/2006
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 14:17:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:07 GMT