- From: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@tigerstaden.no>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:17:58 +0100
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Ai / Hiro <i@orz.cc>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 05:24:13 +0100, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: >> We markup a title with <title/> just because it is a "title". I think >> we should markup a document with <document/> just because it is a >> "document" in terms of the meanings of the content. > > I don't think so, it says nothing about what type of document it is. And neither does <title> say anything about what kind of title it is. So your argument doesn't hold water. I agree with mr. Hiro here. The <html> element is semantically wrong and does not, since the introduction of XML Namespaces, give any information we don't already have to the structure. <document xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> says that this is a "document" written in the "XHTML vocaublary". -- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/ «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2005 19:16:50 UTC