W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > May 2005

Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0

From: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 07:41:43 -0400
Message-ID: <abd6c801050525044142734f3d@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-html@w3.org

How? And then why?

Images, sub-documents, flash media and form elements are all content
and they can't be represented by non-markup. That an the content that
is separator can be represented multiple ways and if you don't turn it
into markup then you can't change its look or how it's presented

Orion Adrian

On 5/25/05, Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl> wrote:
> Orion Adrian wrote:
> > Well yes and no. I see separator more as content than as
> > organiziation. What the author is saying by using it, at least in
> > literay works, is that the separations between this text block and
> > that text block is important. Separator becomes content in that
> > matter.
> I think we should keep markup separate from actual content.
> --
>   Anne van Kesteren
>   <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 11:41:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:10 UTC