W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > May 2005

Re: About XHTML 2.0

From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 14:03:09 +0200
Message-ID: <428F237D.8000508@annevankesteren.nl>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
CC: "webmaster@eammm.com" <webmaster@eammm.com>, www-html@w3.org


Dan Brickley wrote:
> Perhaps <gap/> would work?

Dropping it would work too. I still haven't seen any use cases that 
require this particular empty construct.


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/>

Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 12:02:59 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dan Brickley: "Re: About XHTML 2.0"
Previous message: Dan Brickley: "Re: About XHTML 2.0"
In reply to: Dan Brickley: "Re: About XHTML 2.0"
Next in thread: Dan Brickley: "Re: About XHTML 2.0"
Reply: Dan Brickley: "Re: About XHTML 2.0"
Reply: Mark Birbeck: "RE: About XHTML 2.0"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:38 GMT