> Ignoring that <?xml is not a processing instruction, there's no It is intended to be an SGML processing instruction because the design aim of XML was to be a valid SGML application (using some non-default values for delimiters). > Of course, this whole thread is completely OT on this list. This list has been the traditional place for discussing technical, non-authoring, aspects of XML. There is no W3C list specifically for the discussion of XML's design and xml-editor, as well as not being a discussion list, appears to have been abandoned to the spammers - the spam isn't even being actively cleared.Received on Friday, 24 June 2005 20:30:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:28 GMT