Mark Birbeck wrote: > Personally I would prefer to see a syntax for URIs that copes with both > QNames and URIs in the same attribute--it's what I'd hoped when I first > started work on RDF/A, and is in effect what N3 does. Then it ceases to be > the responsibility of the mark-up, and moves to the realm of the attribute > processing. Why not actually adopt N3 for HTML? Then the about, rel, rev, property, role and resource attributes can either be a qname, or a uri inside <>, or a literal or an anonymous node etc. -- Sjoerd Visscher http://w3future.com/weblog/Received on Thursday, 9 June 2005 21:48:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:38 GMT