W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > June 2005

Re: <separator /> should be <transition />

From: Chiaki <chiaki@dark-chiaki.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 22:24:43 +0200
Message-Id: <122744297@web.de>
To: www-html@w3.org

Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> wrote on 02.06.05 (20:58:16):
> 
> On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 12:36 -0500, Shane McCarron wrote:
> > Personally, couldn't care less about the name of it.  I wanted to use 
> > <bagel />.  I would back this if it were put in as a formal issue.
> 
> Relatedly... Can anyone think of a new acronym from 'h' and 'r' that 
> contracts to <hr/> but isn't a 'horizontal rule'?
> 
> 
> an 'html respite'?
> a 'hypertext rest'?
> 
> I give up for now :)
> 
> Dan
> 
> 

I think, <hr /> is the best way to define a break,
content or structure doesn't matter.

It is short and anyone knows that it is a horizontal rule.
Separator could be a transparent and resized 1px-image too.

Use CSS with classes or such specs to style the rule
and it will work some more years [and xhtml levels] :)

</chiaki>
Received on Friday, 3 June 2005 06:31:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:19:03 UTC