W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > June 2005

Re: <separator /> should be <transition />

From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@tu-clausthal.de>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 00:37:01 +0200
Message-ID: <429F8A0D.5050703@tu-clausthal.de>
To: www-html@w3.org


Dan Brickley schrieb:

> Relatedly... Can anyone think of a new acronym from 'h' and 'r' that 
> contracts to <hr/> but isn't a 'horizontal rule'?

'horrible relict'

Received on Thursday, 2 June 2005 22:37:05 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Micah Dubinko: "Re: separator/seperator Re: About XHTML 2.0"
Previous message: Dsr: "(no subject)"
In reply to: Dan Brickley: "Re: <separator /> should be <transition />"
Next in thread: ACJ: "Re: <separator /> should be <transition />"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:38 GMT