- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:50:36 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> > - It fails to distinguish between the cases of a resource that is > > useless and one that is a good example of how not to do things > > (the latter being, in my view, a legitimate link type relationship). > > Could you please explain this a little futher, I'm not sure I quite > understand. For example, in a page on web design, one may want to link to a page that is by a major company but shows very poor design. One wants people to look at it, but so they can see how bad it is. That's different from saying that that page is of no use to anyone (it may be useful for its intended purpose - they may be a monopoly supplier - and it is useful for education).
Received on Saturday, 22 January 2005 15:50:42 UTC