W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > January 2005

Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)

From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:48:25 +0100
Message-ID: <41F0DDF9.1080303@annevankesteren.nl>
To: Trejkaz <trejkaz@trypticon.org>
CC: www-html@w3.org


Trejkaz wrote:
>>> Why not just rel="nopagerank"?
>> 
>> Why don't they use a processing instruction?
> 
> Or an attribute in a new and appropriate namespace... :-)

Because there are no namespaces in HTML?


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/>

Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 10:48:48 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Trejkaz: "Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)"
Previous message: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: rel="nofollow" attribute"
In reply to: Trejkaz: "Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)"
Next in thread: Trejkaz: "Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)"
Reply: Trejkaz: "Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)"
Reply: David Woolley: "Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:27 GMT