W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > January 2005

Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)

From: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:30:08 +0100
Message-ID: <41F0D9B0.3050400@w3development.de>
To: www-html@w3.org


Rimantas Liubertas wrote:

> Why not just rel="nopagerank"?

Why don't they use a processing instruction?
-- 
Johannes Koch
In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum.
                             (Te Deum, 4th cent.)

Received on Friday, 21 January 2005 10:31:24 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Trejkaz: "Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)"
Previous message: Rimantas Liubertas: "Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)"
In reply to: Rimantas Liubertas: "Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)"
Next in thread: Trejkaz: "Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)"
Reply: Trejkaz: "Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)"
Reply: David Woolley: "Re: Suggestion: 'rel="unrelated"' (was: Re: rel="nofollow" attribute)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:27 GMT