- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:05:51 -0000
- To: www-html@w3.org
"Jesper Tverskov" <jesper.tverskov@mail.tele.dk> wrote in message news:000001c50f67$3f5af1a0$440bc650@tversdatg7y7vv... > 1) First I test if an http accept-header exists. If it does not, as is > the case of Google, I use XHTML 1.1 and mime-type application/xhtml+xml > and I include the xml declaration at the top of the document. Google sends an accept header, so your google analysis here is flawed. > 2) If an http accept-header exists, I test if it contains the string > "application/xhtml+xml". If it does, as is the case for Mozilla/Firefox, > Opera, Amaya, etc. I use XHTML 1.1 and mime-type application/xhtml+xml > and I include the xml declaration at the top of the document (same as > case 1). This is incorrect, the presence of application/xhtml+xml in the accept header does not mean that the user can support that mime-type, please adhere to the relevant standards http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html and 3.9 Jim.
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2005 12:07:05 UTC