On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:38:16 +1100, <trejkaz@trypticon.org> wrote: > Yep, so it looks like it's easier to just try to parse the document as > SGML. Isn't it a problem that valid XHTML is invalid HTML? Won't that make it invalid SGML as well? <url: http://annevankesteren.nl/archives/2004/06/invalid-html> -- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbjornu@hotmail.com «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 06:38:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:01 GMT