- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:28:55 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
Robin Berjon wrote:
> No, that would be terrible. They should simply never be in a namespace.
> XHTML M12N has some provisions for XHTML attributes to become available
> to other vocabularies, but it's not automatic.
Well. Then it means that between attributes {}"foo" and {xhtml}"foo" applying
to element {xhtml}bar, the one {xhtml} user agents should deal with is the one
with no namespace. Please allow me to find a little bit incoherent, to say the
least...
Can you please explain me why attributes applying to XHTML elements have
to have no namespace ? Giving them a namespace is not a blocker for other
vocabularies since it's possible to build an RNG schema defining only
attributes.
</Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 12:29:03 UTC