W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > December 2004

Re: Validating extended XHTML

From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 07:32:13 +0100
Message-ID: <41B7F16D.3010703@annevankesteren.nl>
To: trejkaz@trypticon.org
CC: www-html@w3.org

trejkaz@trypticon.org wrote:
> At Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 12:36:55AM -0000, Jim Ley wrote:
> 
>> At Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:53:49PM +0000, Jim Ley wrote:
>> 
>>>> Which browser contains a validating XML parser?
>>> 
>>> Anything in the Mozilla family, at least.  They will refuse to
>>> even load invalid XML.
>> 
>> The answer was actually IE (depending on what you mean by contains,
>> it's only used if you load documents by scripting and specifically
>> ask for validation).
>> 
>> Mozilla does not have a validating XML parser see
> 
> 
> Oh well.  All I know is that the last few dozen invalid XML documents
> I put through it didn't load.  That's good enough for me, even though
> some FAQ says it doesn't do it.

There is a difference between valid, invalid, well-formed and ill-formed.


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2004 06:32:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:01 GMT