W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > December 2004

XHTML 2 Meta Modules as RDF??? (Was: Re: [ANN] Nemo...)

From: James Cerra <jfcst24_public@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 12:30:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20041208203019.26282.qmail@web42209.mail.yahoo.com>
To: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>, Laurian Gridinoc <laurian@gmail.com>
Cc: HTML WG List <www-html@w3.org>

Lisa, are you referring to 

http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722/mod-meta.html#s_metamodule

If so, I was unaware of that module.  Interesting -
thanks for the head's up.  The examples are a little
confusing. It would be very benifical if the HTML WG
would annote the examples with RDF equivalents (in
either N3 or RDF/XML).

Is there a particular transformation or interpretation
as RDF/XML that the HTML WG had in mind?  RDF isn't
mentioned once on the page, yet the Metainformation
Module seems to borrow a lot of SW concepts from
Resources Typed Literals.  Also, the way they intend
people to use the Metainformation Attribute Modules
seems confusing.  Got any pointer?  :-)

-- Jimmy C.

PS. Nemo should now be retrieved from
http://nemo.dev.java.net

CC. The HTML Working Group so I get their feedback.

At the RDF Interest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>,
Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com> wrote:
> FYI
> if you are planning to since I plan on embedding RDF
> data directly into
> documents. There is a draft for XHTML 2.0 for
> embedding RDF into the body of
> the document using the Link element.
> 
> They are thinking of some other mechanisms too, but
> I think Link was the
> most powerful proposal.
> 
> 
> Keep well
> Lisa


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo 
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2004 20:30:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:01 GMT