W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > April 2004

Re: opposite of em

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 17:55:37 -0400
Message-ID: <40732759.3060400@inkedblade.net>
To: www-html@w3.org

Toby A Inkster wrote:

> On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 17:03, Tonico Strasser wrote:
> 
>>Has anybody considered a new element that is simply the opposite of the 
>>em (emphasis) element? 
> 
> I tend to use <small> for such purposes, and sometimes use CSS to change
> the rendering so that the text is regular-sized but de-emphasised in
> some other way (for example, is pale).
> 
> I think it would be nice if <small> were left in XHTML 2 for this
> purpose, and that the spec specifically said that the default rendering
> for the element needn't be a reduced font size. (In many media -- tty or
> aural, for instance -- font size simply doesn't make sense anyway!)

http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/weblog/2003/big-small/ ?

~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 18:00:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:00 GMT