- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 17:55:37 -0400
- To: www-html@w3.org
Toby A Inkster wrote: > On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 17:03, Tonico Strasser wrote: > >>Has anybody considered a new element that is simply the opposite of the >>em (emphasis) element? > > I tend to use <small> for such purposes, and sometimes use CSS to change > the rendering so that the text is regular-sized but de-emphasised in > some other way (for example, is pale). > > I think it would be nice if <small> were left in XHTML 2 for this > purpose, and that the spec specifically said that the default rendering > for the element needn't be a reduced font size. (In many media -- tty or > aural, for instance -- font size simply doesn't make sense anyway!) http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/weblog/2003/big-small/ ? ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 18:00:26 UTC