W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > April 2004

Re: opposite of em

From: Tonico Strasser <contact_tonico@yahoo.de>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 14:17:05 +0200
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <406C0841.8070803@yahoo.de>

Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

> Maybe this is where I should stop, since presented that way, it sounds
> like a simple and good idea. But I cannot help asking why the emphasis and
> de-emphasis elements should be restricted to text-level content. The main
> reason for this question in this context is that typical renderings of
> <deem> would actually work well for blocks only. Besides, de-emphasizing a
> table for example (say, a table of secondary data, adjacent to a primary
> table) would become awkward if you had to put <deem> inside each cell
> separately.

IC, this seems to be one of those recursive topics.

Thanks anyway.

Tonico
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2004 07:06:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:00 GMT