If you don't question the sense of two or more definitions (and I mean _definitions_) for one term, I propose an extended usage of the old definition list like <dl> <dt>foo</dt> <dd>bar 1</dd> <dd>bar 2</dd> <dt>mickey</dt> <dd>mouse</dd> </dl> Regards, Jens Meiert. > > > > Marcos Caceres said: > > When I think about it some more, doing this kind of nesting may also > > require > > the renaming of the dl, dd, dt, or even adding some sort of container > > that > > wraps around a definition.. Something different like this: > > > > > > > > <dl> > > > > <definition> > > > > <dt>My term</dt> > > > > <dd>This is the a definition</dd> > > > > <dd>This is the another definition</dd> > > > > </definition> > > > > </dl> > > This sounds a lot better to me > -- Jens Meiert Steubenstr. 28 D-26123 Oldenburg Telefon +49 (0)441 99 86 147 Telefax +49 (0)89 1488 2325 91 Mobil +49 (0)175 78 4146 5 eMail <jens@meiert.com> Internet <http://meiert.com>Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2003 04:32:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:32 GMT