W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > May 2003

Re: Magic Elements (was: kelvSYC's Thoughts on the new XHTML Draft)

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 20:23:47 +0300
To: hsivonen@niksula.hut.fi
Message-Id: <9BFBFF82-86FB-11D7-80D6-003065B8CF0E@iki.fi>

On Sunday, May 11, 2003, at 05:44 Europe/Helsinki, Jelks Cabaniss wrote:

> c. Keep <q> and *recommend* its use (where appropriate).

I prefer removing <q> in favor of <quote>. <q> is about using 
fancy-looking markup as a surrogate for punctuation because it is 
somehow thought that the proper punctuation can't be written. They are 
more about surrogates for punctuation than about exact markup 
delimiting a quoted string, because in practice the end tag would be 
placed where the closing quote would be placed in en-US even if that 
meant the last character of the delimited string wasn’t actually be 
quoted from an outside source but was part of a surrounding sentence.

<p xml:lang="en-GB"><q>I’m quoting</q>, she said.</p>
<p xml:lang="en-US"><q>I’m quoting,</q> he said.</p>

> 	He said, <quote>"I'm stuck with hardcoded ugly quotes
> 	but I can be used by anybody in the world if they
> 	really want to go to that much trouble!"</quote>
> 	Smiling at his boorishness, she replied, <q>I can't
> 	be deeply nested, and I only work well in a Gringo-
> 	Eurotrash world, but I'm a heck of a lot better
> 	looking than you are.</q>
> 	Ambling hand-in-hand (they were, after all, soulmates)
> 	off into the sunset, he sweetly (and un-marked-up-edly)
> 	murmured, &ldquo;We DO make a beautiful couple, don't
> 	we?&rdquo;

<quote>“We look as good as the two last candidates and we don’t need 
markup or entities to stand in for us. While we’re at it, we can 
delimit a quotation with other characters that allegedly can’t be typed 
such as €, α and ů.”</quote>

Henri Sivonen
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2003 13:35:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:03 UTC