W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > May 2003

Re: Using RELAX NG in XHTML 2.0

From: Karl Ove Hufthammer <karl@huftis.org>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 22:56:23 +0200
Message-Id: <n2m-g.Xns937BE95A83971huftis@ID-99504.news.dfncis.de>
To: www-html@w3.org

David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> wrote in
news:200305140612.h4E6CwD02539@djwhome.demon.co.uk:

>> browsers, but I'm not so sure anymore. Validating is really a
>> *tool* for *authors* to ensure that they produce high-quality
>> documents / technically 'correct' documents / documents that
>
> The reality, though, is that the vast majority of authors use
> browsers as their only validators.

Yes. And I agree that having built-in validators in browsers would
be a nice thing to have. But this is no argument *for* DTDs and
against RELAX NG -- on the contrary, I would say.

-- 
Karl Ove Hufthammer
http://blogg.huftis.org/
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 17:22:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:55 GMT