John Lewis wrote: [snip] > dl/dt/dd are good names. You haven't provided me with a good reason > why we need new names, or why dl/dt/dd are bad names. (You say the > benefits of good names are "widely accepted," but you don't list any. > You also haven't explained why dl/dt/dd are bad names--unless being > unintuitive means bad.) That is exactly the point : unintuitive means "bad". Period. Philip Taylor, RHBNCReceived on Monday, 17 March 2003 16:44:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:03 UTC