W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > March 2003

Re: Key/Item data

From: Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 21:45:33 +0000
Message-ID: <3E7641FD.FEC28BE1@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: John Lewis <lewi0371@mrs.umn.edu>
CC: www-html@w3.org 



John Lewis wrote:
[snip]

> dl/dt/dd are good names. You haven't provided me with a good reason
> why we need new names, or why dl/dt/dd are bad names. (You say the
> benefits of good names are "widely accepted," but you don't list any.
> You also haven't explained why dl/dt/dd are bad names--unless being
> unintuitive means bad.) 

That is exactly the point : unintuitive means "bad".  Period.
Philip Taylor, RHBNC
Received on Monday, 17 March 2003 16:44:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:54 GMT