W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > March 2003

RE: Font Style Elements

From: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design <nigel@miswebdesign.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 22:37:49 -0000
To: "Toby A Inkster" <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk>
Cc: "Wingnut" <wingnut@winternet.com>, <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BFECLKEDIHDIPFDEBCFNOEFADMAA.nigel@miswebdesign.com>

Sorry it was unfortunate that I replied to your mail. I was referring to
Wingnut's argument and agreeing with yours :)

Cheers,
Nigel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Toby A Inkster [mailto:tobyink@goddamn.co.uk]
> Sent: 07 March 2003 19:16
> To: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
> Cc: Wingnut; www-html@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Font Style Elements
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:28:02AM -0000, Nigel Peck - MIS Web
> Design wrote:
> | If I'm understanding this argument correctly if style is passed
> around like
> | this and merged on a page I would imagine that the pages could
> just end up
> | looking like a complete mess. Surely content should be passed
> and styling
> | should be the responsibility of the site merging the content.
> |
> | Users need consistency of deign on a site, not a mess of styles
> created by
> | people with no communication between them.
>
> No, you're not understanding my argument. I was arguing precisely that
> content should be passed from document 2 to document 1, but not style.
>
> --
> Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS | mailto:tobyink@goddamn.co.uk |
> pgp:0x6A2A7D39
>     aim:inka80 | icq:6622880 | yahoo:tobyink | jabber:tobyink@a-message.de
>             http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/ | "You've got spam!"
>                              playing://(nothing)
>
Received on Friday, 7 March 2003 19:11:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:54 GMT