W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > June 2003

RE: favicon.ico vs <link> - add link type for shortcut icon?

From: Chris Moschini <Chris.Moschini@amdocs.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:50:52 -0500
Message-ID: <3DB269E1BEC8134084EAA64AD4A1E0CF0F0CF2@stlmail1.corp.amdocs.com>
To: "'Jens Meiert'" <jens.meiert@erde3.com>, Chris Moschini <Chris.Moschini@amdocs.com>
Cc: www-html@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
Well, on one hand, I do like that title attribute. It's sensible relative to the meaning of the tag. However, I feel the icon makes sense in CSS because:

1) It *is* strictly presentation; the icon has no "content," no added meaning to the user. It simply offers a branding opportunity. Images meanwhile *can* have content, and therefore may or may not make sense to be called from CSS.

2) Including it in CSS would resolve the issue of having to include a link rel="icon" tag on every page on a site. The CSS reference would resolve it as any site-wide CSS would reference the icon. Alternately, section-wide CSS may reference the icon, meaning different sections of a site could have different icons (useful and sensible).

All "favicon" purpose does seem to point to CSS's intent... .

-Chris "SoopahMan" Moschini
http://hiveminds.info/
http://soopahman.com/

(ignore attachment)



-----Original Message-----
From: Jens Meiert [mailto:jens.meiert@erde3.com]

> perhaps reference to
> "favicon" belongs in a site's CSS instead

Why!? Otherwise please be consequent and stop all the object element
discussion and simply put all images into your CSS...!

I think the 'favicon' topic is very special, and I neither appreciate a
extra link element use nor a CSS integration for it, that's both inelegantly for
me. Either define a common place and name for it (as exists and often works
as 'favicon.ico' in the server root) and leave it from markup, or integrate it
e.g. as a <title /> attribute like

     <title icon="./foo/bar.gif" />


All the best,
 Jens.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The information contained in this message is proprietary of Amdocs,

protected from disclosure, and may be privileged.

The information is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s)

of the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,

you are hereby notified that any dissemination, use, distribution or copying of 

this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. 

If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately

by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

Thank you.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 30 June 2003 12:51:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:55 GMT