W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > June 2003

RE: favicon.ico vs <link> - add link type for shortcut icon?

From: Chris Moschini <Chris.Moschini@amdocs.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:10:23 -0500
Message-ID: <3DB269E1BEC8134084EAA64AD4A1E0CF04C85F@stlmail1.corp.amdocs.com>
To: "'Joris Huizer'" <joris_huizer@yahoo.com>, www-html@w3.org
> Well, I think the main reason might be, this link type
only has something to do with graphical browsers;
text-only browsers, or speech browsers - will simply
ignore it...

Although it's only really useful for graphical browsers, that doesn't mean it's useless.

That is interesting you mention CSS however; perhaps reference to "favicon" belongs in a site's CSS instead. Adding this to the standard would at least ensure Mozilla and Opera would follow quickly, though IE it appears is set in stone... .

If a link tag is used, I agree "shortcut icon" is entirely innappropriate. It refers specifically to the Windows Desktop, and violates standards regarding the rel attribute. "icon" is the proper value. I also agree that Mozilla's acceptance of any image type (not just the .ico format) is appropriate.

The question lies in, I suppose:

Should the standard be one that formally agrees with and expands what's already there (that is, link rel="icon", any image format), or should it avoid such an obscure syntax and be added to the most sensible place for it, CSS, even though it means it will never see light of day on authors' sites for at least several years to come?

-Chris "SoopahMan" Moschini
http://hiveminds.info/
http://soopahman.com/

(ignore attachment)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The information contained in this message is proprietary of Amdocs,

protected from disclosure, and may be privileged.

The information is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s)

of the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,

you are hereby notified that any dissemination, use, distribution or copying of 

this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. 

If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately

by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

Thank you.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 30 June 2003 11:11:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:55 GMT