James Brown wrote: > Thank you for your comments. I agree that the tags would definately have to > specify the type of date contained in the date field. That was kind of what > I was trying to acheive by the format="us" or format="uk" attribute, but > this is my first attempt at documenting an idea for the W3C so I'm sure I > didn't express it properly! NITF 3.1 <http://www.nitf.org/site/nitf-documentation/nitf-3-1.dtd> has e.g. a story.date element including #PCDATA with a norm attribute defined as norm Date/time value normalized to ISO 8601: YYYYMMDDTHHMMSS-HHMM (preferred) YYYYMMDDTHHMMSSZ (alternative). Use YYYYMMDD000000-HHMM when no time is available Unfortunately, NITF doesn't have a namespace, so that they cannot be mixed with XHTML elements in an XHTML host language. -- Johannes Koch In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum. (Te Deum, 4th cent.)Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2003 04:47:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:32 GMT