- From: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 09:57:19 +0200
- To: www-html@w3.org
Jens Meiert wrote:
>>I agree consistancy is good, and don't see a problem with adding <obj />
>>as an alias for <object /> as long as the original method remains.
>
>
> I didn't want the opportunity (?) to have 1+ aliases for an element, but a
> consequent naming of elements (and getting rid of endless naming discussions
> by e.g. a guideline). And if you refer to parsing speed, you are right
> worrying about performance losings having several names for one element -- but if
> you use full element names, you lose transfer speed.
and (among others) full-quoted the full-qzote of the full-quote of ...
Since not everyone has a free 4Mbit connection, could we all please
quote _only what is necessary_?
Thanks
--
Johannes Koch
In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum.
(Te Deum, 4th cent.)
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 03:58:49 UTC