W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > January 2003

Re: suggestion

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 15:42:18 -0500
Message-Id: <200301242042.PAA18214@no-knife.mit.edu>
To: vlad@logicmagic.com
cc: www-html@w3.org

> I was reading about XHTML and I was disappointed to find that there is no
> tree construct.

<nl> is in the XHTML 2.0 drafts... does that do pretty much what you want?

We are all agreed that your theory is crazy.  The
question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough
to have a chance of being correct.  My own feeling is
that it is not crazy enough.
                                     -- Niels Bohr
Received on Friday, 24 January 2003 15:42:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:02 UTC