W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > January 2003

Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful

From: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:40:54 +0100
Message-ID: <3E2564E6.5050608@netscape.com>
To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
CC: "www html w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>


Tantek Çelik wrote:

>I too prefer <L> over <BR>, but why not just keep <BR> and deprecate it?
>

I think that's the only choice. I think that <br/> cannot be replaced by 
<l>. Read the following

http://daniel.glazman.free.fr/weblog/archived/2003_01_12_glazblogarc.html#87473606

</Daniel>

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 08:41:40 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ian Hickson: "Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful"
Previous message: Ian Hickson: "Re: Re[2]: Proposal for XHTML 2.0: The <footnote> element"
In reply to: Tantek Çelik: "Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful"
Next in thread: Ian Hickson: "Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful"
Reply: Ian Hickson: "Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:54 GMT