- From: Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:00:29 +0000
- To: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
- CC: Jonas Jørgensen <jonasj@jonasj.dk>, www-html@w3.org
But that's not what "kbd" (and its ilk) accomplish; they simply provide semantic sugar rather than fundamentally affecting the way in which their content is interpreted. Philip Taylor, RHBNC -------- Daniel Glazman wrote: > > Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] wrote: > > >But : what is so special about computer code that tags specific to > >writing about /it/ deserve a place in the core tag site, whilst > >tags specific to writing about (say) linguistics do not ? Surely > >there is nothing special about computer code /within the aegis of > >XHTML/ that deserves it being given special attention. > > > > Except the fact that code should be usable as is, ie with no need for > entity resolution and no "<" detection until the closing tag of the code > section is hit. > That's not the case now and that's a pity all people writing technical > documents about the web hit every day. > > </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 17:00:37 UTC