RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful

• From: Jelks Cabaniss <jelks@jelks.nu>
• Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:29:31 -0500
• To: "'www html w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <001001c2bbfa$e20b3a80$6501a8c0@blackie>

Daniel Glazman wrote:

> XHTML 2.0 seems to me the live proof that something 
> is going wrong at W3C. 

Is something going wrong at the W3C Considered Harmful?


/Jelks

Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 13:29:42 UTC