W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > January 2003

RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful

From: Jelks Cabaniss <jelks@jelks.nu>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:29:31 -0500
To: "'www html w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001001c2bbfa$e20b3a80$6501a8c0@blackie>


Daniel Glazman wrote:

> XHTML 2.0 seems to me the live proof that something 
> is going wrong at W3C. 

Is something going wrong at the W3C Considered Harmful?


/Jelks

Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 13:29:42 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jelks Cabaniss: "RE: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful"
Previous message: Mikko Rantalainen: "Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful"
In reply to: Daniel Glazman: "Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful"
Next in thread: David Woolley: "Re: XHTML 2.0 considered harmful"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:19 GMT