W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 2003

Re: RE: H1

From: <veith.risak@chello.at>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:07:03 +0100
To: Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi>, Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design <nigel@miswebdesign.com>
Cc: "Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>, <www-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20030213100703.WPHV23710.viefep14-int.chello.at@[127.0.0.1]>

I think, that the structure of <h1>, <h2>, ... should make it easier to write "pure hierarchical" documents.
If you agree than only one <h1> is possible.
"Unrelated topics" should not be at the first level on a page. I prefer one common topic (with <h1>) and then the subtopics as <h2>.
If it is not possible to find a common topic, why not use two separate pages?

Kind regards

V. Risak
Univ. of Salzburg
risak@cosy.sbg.ac.at
> 
> Von: Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi>
> Datum: 2003/02/12 Mi PM 11:08:46 GMT+01:00
> An: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design <nigel@miswebdesign.com>
> CC: "Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>,  www-html@w3.org
> Betreff: RE: H1
> 
> 
> On 2003-02-12, Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design uttered to Sampo Syreeni:
> 
> >But if they're unrelated shouldn't they be on separate pages in theory?
> 
> There's no such rule. Pages are pages, and if somebody thinks unrelated
> topics should be on the same page, well, what can we do about it?
> -- 
> Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - mailto:decoy@iki.fi, tel:+358-50-5756111
> student/math+cs/helsinki university, http://www.iki.fi/~decoy/front
> openpgp: 050985C2/025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2
> 
>
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2003 05:19:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:54 GMT