W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 2003

Re: H1

From: Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:47:20 +0200 (EET)
To: Jared Warren <warren@cs.queensu.ca>
cc: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.51.0302130044100.19019@kruuna.Helsinki.FI>

On 2003-02-12, Jared Warren uttered to www-html@w3.org:

>Exactly. Which is why the *default* stylesheet can suggest some places it
>might be shown, but authors should not make any assumptions about where
>it will turn up.

Precisely. My point is, you shouldn't make such assumptions about anything
else, either. Not H?'s, P's or BLOCKQUOTE's. The primary sense in which
the semantics of such elements should be defined isn't how they appear or
how they're usually handled, but what they mean. Leave the interpretation
to the UA, in whole.

>My opinion is that H elements shall only be allowed to be the children of
>SECTIONs, and BODY's equivalent shall be TITLE.

True. However, this only brings us to the question, why on Earth shouldn't
there be more than one parallel SECTION per BODY.
-- 
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - mailto:decoy@iki.fi, tel:+358-50-5756111
student/math+cs/helsinki university, http://www.iki.fi/~decoy/front
openpgp: 050985C2/025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 17:47:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15:54 GMT